VivaMalta - The Free Speech Forum - Articles on Eugenics

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 24, 2014, 06:38:40 PM

Home Forum Help Search Login Register
+  VivaMalta - The Free Speech Forum
|-+  Forum
| |-+  Humanities and Science
| | |-+  Biology and Genetics
| | | |-+  Articles on Eugenics
* * *
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Articles on Eugenics  (Read 3025 times)
marco polo
Senior Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 11571

« on: March 04, 2008, 10:18:22 PM »

excellent article. jews are right! of course they advocate the opposite for us.

http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/eugenics_in_a_most_unlikely_place/

Eugenics in a most unlikely place.

  It is common practice, now that eugenics in moving quickly within the science of reproductive genetics, to dismiss eugenics as pseudoscience. In fact, eugenics never ceased to play its part in demographics as it went from negative eugenics to Planned Parenthood, to preimplantation diagnosis, to sperm banks and attempts at cloning. Along with this goes the unfolding testing of individual?s genetic code revealing their personal genealogy or racial makeup.
 
In Darwin Day in America: how our politics and culture have been dehumanized in the name of science by John G. West, 2007, a very typical approach is used to delegitimize eugenics:
 ?For decades, eugenics was embraced as legitimate by America?s leading scientists and scientific organizations such as the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Critics of eugenics, meanwhile, were stigmatized as antiscience and religious zealots. Yet the critics turned out to be right.?
 In most books that mention eugenics, this is the standard rebuttal?a factual sounding statement without substance. Eugenics is a very broad area of scientific inquiry and breeding practice?as simple as picking a healthy mate to assure healthy children to selecting a defective fetus to be aborted.
 Then I came across a book that reveals just how progressive Israeli eugenics is in comparison to Germany, with most modern countries in-between. A Life (Un)Worthy of Living: Reproductive Genetics in Israel and Germany, by Yael Hashiloni-Dolev, 2007, shows that the Israeli attitudes are closer to the progressive era attitudes that prevailed 100 years ago. As a modern, progressive state that embraces science and eugenics, it is quite absurd to claim that there is anything but solid science driving the genetic revolution, and one cannot separate eugenics from this scientific advancement. In Israel, the purpose is to have only healthy children, have as many children as possible, while giving preference to the life of the mother over the fetus where the interest of each is in conflict.
 
  Hashiloni-Dolev states, ?These data simply shocked and amazed me, as it demonstrated not only that Israeli geneticists were shown to be extremely enthusiastic about the personal and social uses of reproductive genetics, but also that German geneticists were found to be extremely cautious concerning the same medical technology, its uses and desirable social outcomes. In fact, Wertz and Fletcher?s findings revealed that Israeli and German geneticists were placed on two extremes, one enthusiastic, the other halfhearted, concerning the uses and outcomes of reproductive genetics, while geneticists from all other ?advanced liberal societies? were placed somewhere between those two poles.?
 In a survey for example, the percentages of geneticists agreeing with the following statement: ?It is not fair to a child to bring it into the world with a serious genetic disorder? was 68% for Israelis, 40% for Americans, and 18% for Germans.
 Hashiloni-Dolev then describes the use of the word eugenics: ?Another word that I do not often use in this work is eugenics. This is because this term is contaminated by its history (which is itself diversified) and hence, it nowadays often operates as a ?buzz word?, which serves to block a contemporary, open, moral debate about the current uses of reproductive genetics. As I believe that contemporary reproductive genetics has both its blessings and its burdens as it is both liberating and discriminating and constraining at the same time, I prefer using the term reproductive genetics and not more critical and biased terms like ?voluntary eugenics? or ?free-market eugenics?. This of course does not mean those terms do not portray large parts of the picture of contemporary reproductive genetics, only that they overlook other important parts of the picture, which I do not wish to ignore. Yet, while writing about the past, the term ?eugenics? is obviously more appropriate?. Obviously, what initially made me research this topic was my uneasiness with the practices of Israeli society, with its intolerance towards the genetically deviant and its lack of critical thinking about the moral conflicts embodied in reproductive genetics. Yet, as the research advanced (and I became the mother of two boys) and after getting to know the German field of reproductive genetics, things ceased to be so simple. Whereas Israeli women are generally actively recruited (one may even say: seduced) to take genetic examinations and even to abort fetuses which are, (or are suspected to be) ?genetically abnormal?, their German counterparts usually simply do not know or know very little about the options opened up by this new technology.?
 Hashiloni-Dolev points out that eugenics, the Holocaust, shame from the Second World War, racism; these are all used by German leftists and conservatives alike as sledgehammers to push their political programs. On the other hand, ?Concerning Israel, Hazan has claimed that the creation of the Israeli imagined community depends upon an intensive occupation with the body, as the Israeli-Jewish collective is symbolized in terms of its body. Equally, several writers have observed that the Zionist social movement has been extremely occupied with distancing itself from the iconic frail image of the body of the Diaspora Jew. However, by making this move a paradox emerged: while Zionist national discourse often perceives the existence of an independent Jewish state to be a consequence of the Jewish Holocaust, the similarity between the Zionist rejection of the Diaspora Jewish body and Nazi eugenic murderous practices are often overlooked. Even more so, Falk, a prominent Israeli geneticist, reads the entire history of Zionism as itself a eugenicist project. Likewise, writing about excluded Israeli bodies, Weiss coined the term ?the chosen body? to describe the Israeli collective body, which is a code according to which concrete bodies are monitored, screened, molded and selected from womb to tomb. According to her, the Israeli ?chosen body? emanates from both the Zionist movement, which strove for the rehabilitation of the weak Jewish body, and the Jewish religious tradition, which is intolerant towards physical disability. Thus, the Israeli body of today worships healthy, fit, competent and whole bodies. Hence, Weiss argues that it is this ?chosen body? collective ideal and its selectivity that is responsible for the Israeli quest for the ?perfect child?, a quest that by regulating mother?s and fetuses? bodies also constructs the Israeli collective identity.?
 German Racial hygiene and eugenics during the 1930s was not rejected by other countries, as its sterilization laws were seen as by far the most progressive. What was rejected was the violent anti-Semitism. Because of this, immediately upon the establishment of the state of Israel, human genetic studies were initiated and openly accepted. The primary impetus at this time was to do genetic studies on Jewish immigrants to determine how closely different groups were related, or how much genetic material they had absorbed from the people they lived amongst. The studies showed that there was little gene influx from non-Jewish populations. In fact, ?Rafael Falk, a prominent Israeli genetics professor, reads the entire history of Zionism as a eugenicist project. He states that the understanding of Judaism as a biological essence became an integral part of Zionist thought towards the end of the 19th century. While most European Jews tried to fight against the idea of Judaism being a ?race?, prominent Zionists such as Hess, Herzl, Bialik, Nordau and even Buber argued that the biological dimension of the Jewish ?Volk? should not be overlooked. Similarly to Falk, Stoler-Liss, who writes about Zionist motherhood, also claims that in the 20s, 30s and even beyond, eugenic thought was prevalent among Zionist pediatricians, gynecologists, general practitioners and other types of experts and ?advisors? in the Yishuv, who were trying to both quantitatively and qualitatively better future generations of ?Zabarim.??
 There is nothing really new when it comes to the Jewish religion and the practice of eugenics. As Kevin MacDonald points out, Jews from Eastern Europe at least practiced?or continued to practice?arranged marriages between highly intelligent scholars and wealthy businessmen. On the less intelligent side of the bell curve, those with low intelligence were given nominal assistance when in need, and if they were not seen as healthy, intelligent, and resourceful Jews they were encouraged to move out of the community.
 Hashiloni-Dolev states, ?Concerning Judaism?. Jewish law has always been supportive of eugenic ideas (even before modern genetics was founded), as it encouraged individuals to be responsible to society and to the generations yet unborn in a manner that was unknown in any preceding system of religious thought or social medicine. In addition, different provisions in Jewish law from medieval times were clearly motivated by eugenic considerations for the moral excellence of the progeny, which they associated with physical [and mental] excellence, as they prohibited marriage into families with hereditary disorders. By contrast, in his essay about Jewish eugenics, Noam Zohar contends that the conventional views which perceive Jewish tradition to be eugenic and one may even say racist (with its idea of the ?chosen people?), involve a one-sided reading of the Jewish tradition and particularly, the suppression of traditional critiques of lineage and of the notion of a ?Jewish race??. In interviews with chairpersons of Israeli disability organizations, Raz has found that they perceive prenatal genetic testing to be eugenic. However, they supported it for precisely that reason, as eugenics has no negative connotations for them, implying only an improvement in the health of their progeny.?
 Israel also uses a cost benefit-analysis when looking at applications to use such as prenatal diagnosis leading to abortions of defectives. For every dollar spent on prenatal diagnosis, 55 dollars is saved on medical costs caring for genetic abnormalities. ?Thus, at the prenatal stage, non-tolerance towards the genetically deviant is the norm among Israeli counselors, while more tolerant or optimistic counseling characterizes German counselors.?
 And in Israel what is considered an unfit fetus is much more lax: ?Nonetheless, the total responsibility for abortion practices cannot be placed entirely on the shoulders of the professionals: the wording of the law obviously also has implications. Analyzing the language of the Israeli law, Shapira writes: ?The phraseology adopted by the Israeli legislature appears to reveal an unmistakably lenient policy on abortion for eugenic reasons. The physical or mental defect justifying interruption of pregnancy need not necessarily be extensive or grievous. An ordinary, perhaps even a relatively minor, defect may suffice. Furthermore, the defect need only be ?likely? as distinct from certain or probable. The term ?likely? seems to denote a more reasonable possibility, which may fall short of a near certainty or a high probability.??
  Abortion in Israel seems to elicit apathy, only becoming a problem if it is seen as reducing the number of sound children (aborting fit children). Neither feminists or pro-life activists have any impact on eugenic policy. In addition, the medical establishment and counselors are primarily pro-science and actively secular, rejecting religious viewpoints. This includes seeing the fetus as part of its mother and without any autonomous rights. In fact, the fetus?s right is limited to not being born?the medical practitioner could be sued for ?wrongful life.?
 Israel today has a high fertility rate due primarily to their culture and desire to outbreed the Arabs that also have a high fertility rate and could become the dominant ethnic group in the future. This high fertility is no doubt aided by their eugenic practices. When parents are free of caring for a disabled child they can put more resources in having fit children. In addition, fit children can grow up and have children of their own. ?[T]he Jewish Rabbinic and Halakhic literature often devalue and stigmatize the disabled, who have no function concerning the morality of the community.?
 The Israeli approach to reproduction is far more empirical, practical, and encouraging for others to adopt. ?Whereas all German counselors paid respect to the idea of human genetic diversity, either for the sake of a humanistic ethos, or for the sake of biological diversity, Israelis completely mocked those ideas. Likewise, whereas German counselors felt their society had to be reminded of the fact that life is not all about money and fun, Israeli counselors did not share this feeling. For example, an Israeli women genetic counselor said: ?Do people with severe disabilities make society more rich and varied? Maybe on the philosophical level. But in reality, I want to see you spend one day with a child with cerebral palsy or mental retardation, and then you will see what it really means. Then I will ask you again what you think of the high minded who say it?s nice. There are enough things that make our lives diversified without suffering. One should not have disabled children in order to enrich the world or to make his neighbor more sensitive.??
  Note that cerebral palsy can occur from a brain injury just before birth and even into childhood. For this reason, Israelis allow partial birth abortions, and in the future may even allow euthanasia for a period after birth. This is in keeping with their understanding of what is important in life. ?In contrast, according to Marx (2002), attitudes to disability found in Jewish thinking are often disturbing to contemporary sensibilities, as Jewish culture is to a large extent a competence-oriented culture of ?learners?, which excludes and stigmatizes the disabled. Concerning contemporary Israeli society, Weiss, in her thesis about the Israeli collective body ideal, which she terms the ?chosen body?, contends that it worships healthy, fit, competent and whole bodies. Accordingly, the disabled are negatively stereotyped in the Israeli culture. Likewise, suffering is not glorified or endowed with personal or collective meanings and the life of the severely handicapped is believed to be wrongful.?
 This healthy attitude towards life by Israelis seems to be held together by a serious appreciation for science and logic over ideology and dogma. However, it is ironic that many of the books and articles decrying eugenics, calling it pseudoscience, are produced by American Jewish scholars making numerous outrageous claims about it being a ?White supremacist? plot, a right-wing movement, genocide against Blacks, etc. In reality the early eugenics movement was part of the progressive era and promoted by the same type of activists that today drive the environmental movement, and all of them can be considered more left wing and socialist than conservative. (Goldberg in Liberal Fascism, 2007) Eugenics, to work effectively, and not turn into a utopian adventure, must be firmly grounded in scientific materialism with a desire for beauty, health, intellect, prosperity, aesthetics, and reduced societal hostilities over differences that can never be resolved rationally.
Report to moderator   Logged

We must built ships that will not traverse the Seven Seas but the Milky Way and the stars beyond, ships with no sails but engines powered by fuel, sweat and the creative cunning of the race that gave the world everything and will give the universe more than even God ever dreamt of. - Ogeno
IMPERIUM
Norman Lowell
Global Moderator
Senior Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 9483


« Reply #1 on: February 24, 2011, 05:59:03 PM »

Interesting article, eloquent but false.
Leaving huge areas to "stupid people" will mean that others, non Europids will take them over.
Territory is an Imperium prerogative, realm of the Elite - it must never be ceded.
 
On the ToM the other day: Mother of 10 accused of petty theft.
http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20110223/local/mother-of-10-accused-of-petty-theft
 
A 35-year-old mother of 10 yesterday denied six counts of petty theft as she stood in the dock wiping tears from her face.
The woman, from Paola, denied stealing from a pharmacy, a supermarket and from four clothes shops, between December 2 and Monday.
During her arraignment, she said her three younger children, the youngest being three-years old, had been living with her but were now with her mother-in-law. Magistrate Audrey Demicoli denied bail because the accused has no fixed address.
 
It is obvious that she should have been sterilized, years ago.
Her offspring will become a ten fold problem for society.
Eugenics will be rigidly enforced in the coming Imperium.
 
The Jamesons (Irish) that were on the Mayflower, comprised four mentally defective girls.
The family descendants have been traced: murderers, rapists, paedophiles, violent burglary...
The cost of this family to the USA: 21 times what it cost to put the first American on the moon.
 
That is Eugenics.
 
Imperium
1102
Report to moderator   Logged
Boycott The Times and The Sunday Times.
Do not post there, do not buy a copy of either, do not advertise.
Hurt Them in the only way they understand.

BOYCOTT THE TIMES
 Imperium 1107

ricsi
Moderator
Loyal Member
Senior Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 998


« Reply #2 on: February 24, 2011, 08:01:00 PM »

Quote from: IMPERIUM
Interesting article, eloquent but false.
Leaving huge areas to "stupid people" will mean that others, non Europids will take them over.
Territory is an Imperium prerogative, realm of the Elite - it must never be ceded.
 
On the ToM the other day: Mother of 10 accused of petty theft.
http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20110223/local/mother-of-10-accused-of-petty-theft
 
A 35-year-old mother of 10 yesterday denied six counts of petty theft as she stood in the dock wiping tears from her face.
The woman, from Paola, denied stealing from a pharmacy, a supermarket and from four clothes shops, between December 2 and Monday.
During her arraignment, she said her three younger children, the youngest being three-years old, had been living with her but were now with her mother-in-law. Magistrate Audrey Demicoli denied bail because the accused has no fixed address.
 
It is obvious that she should have been sterilized, years ago.
Her offspring will become a ten fold problem for society.
Eugenics will be rigidly enforced in the coming Imperium.
 
The Jamesons (Irish) that were on the Mayflower, comprised four mentally defective girls.
The family descendants have been traced: murderers, rapists, paedophiles, violent burglary...
The cost of this family to the USA: 21 times what it cost to put the first American on the moon.
 
That is Eugenics.
 
Imperium
1102

Well the 'Jameson' whisky is very good!!!
Report to moderator   Logged
The Hungarian language may be the root and mother of all languages of the ancient world
Berzsenyi Daniel,1830
ricsi
Moderator
Loyal Member
Senior Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 998


« Reply #3 on: May 19, 2011, 03:10:13 PM »

http://www.google.com/cse" id="searchbox_017254414699180528062:uyrcvn__yd0" class="blogSearch">
       
PZ Myers is a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris.
pharyngula stage embryoRecent Posts
  Evolution is a Jewish conspiracy

   Category: CreationismEvilStupidity
Posted on: May 18, 2011  8:15 AM, by PZ Myers
     The essay starts off stupidly enough.   In 1867 Karl Marx dedicated DasKapital to Charles Darwin.
Actually, no, he didn't. It's a fairly common lie in creationist circles, though, just like the others sprinkled throughout the story.   Modern creation science is led by an array of top-flight Ph.D. scientists, including biochemists, paleontologists, astronomers and geologists. It presents a formidable battery of evidence now knocking hundreds of holes in traditional evolutionary arguments. As never before, scientific creationism debunks the contrived "evidence" that evolutionary theory has fed on since Darwin.
No, it isn't. Creation science is led by a gang of ignorant clods who can't read a paper without mangling it.
  But OK, so far this is just your standard modus operandi for creationists. The really weird stuff is shouted out in the title: JEWISH SUPREMACISTS USE EVOLUTION TO CORRUPT MANKIND. Did you know that evolution is a Jewish conspiracy to corrupt Western civilization?   Why doesn't the scientific community abandon Darwin's failed hypotheses? Simple: The Jewish-dominated media and educational establishment are determined that, like unconditional support of Israel, Holocaust mythology, hate laws, and "civil rights" favoritism, there will be no end to the relentless force-feeding of evolution. Belief in evolution is a prerequisite for Jewish supremacism's new-world order.
Yet anti-Zionist leadership on the right remains oblivious to the fact that evolution is the largest, ugliest, most aggressive tentacle of the Jewish revolutionary octopus. Anti-Zionists are often evolutionists, claiming that Jews evolved in a way that makes them inherently degenerate, subversive, and corruptive. They make the most Luciferian, dehumanizing fable ever invented by pseudo-science into a pillar of their thinking!
The Reverend Ted Pike is kind of obsessed with Jews. They're behind everything.
  You see, the degenerate Jews promote evolution, which led the Nazis to kill Jews, and we must organize resistance to the Jewish agenda and the Judaic threat, and we absolutely must support Israel without question. Every paragraph drips with anti-semitic bigotry, but at the same time he rants against the wicked anti-Zionists.
  I've seen this often in fundamentalist Christians. Jews aren't really people; they're just props in the script of their eschatology. We have to keep them around because the True Final Solution is for Jesus to exterminate most of them and convert the survivors, and if we jump the gun and kill them all now, why, that would invalidate the Bible, which would be wicked.   The problem we face today originates in Jewish rebellion to Christ. It is primarily a moral issue which cannot be addressed by dehumanizing Jews or violence. It must be met with reason and persuasion, even love. The Bible presents Jewish apostasy as part of a long-range scenario that will ultimately result in anti-Christ world rule but also redemption of a remnant of Jews out of great tribulation at Christ's second coming. The problem of Jewish supremacism ultimately is Christ's problem, to be resolved by Him, not military or persecutive measures.
This is why Adolf Hitler and the Nazis must be damned. Not because they killed people, but because they lead us into "anti-biblical, evolutionary, racist errors". We must support Israel because it's a kind of holding pen for the Jews, where they will be annihilated in Armageddon, and you're a bad, bad person if you begin the slaughter prematurely.
  Despite the fact that I don't have any evidence of any Jewish background in my lineage, I do have to cop to being an ugly evolutionary tentacle, and there are most certainly Jews in my readership. Does it make you feel all warm and happy and safe to peek into the minds of some of the most ardent Christian supporters of Israel?
     
 
Report to moderator   Logged
The Hungarian language may be the root and mother of all languages of the ancient world
Berzsenyi Daniel,1830
IMPERIUM
Norman Lowell
Global Moderator
Senior Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 9483


« Reply #4 on: May 30, 2011, 09:36:53 AM »

http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20110530/opinion/Can-euthanasia-be-a-human-right-.367979
 

Monday, May 30, 2011 , by Caroline Galea
 
 
Can euthanasia be a human right?info@carolinegalea.com
 
 
The author limits herself to assisted suicide.
Of course, Euthanasia should not be limited to this.
It is but a facet of Eugenics.
 
Why should the horrendously deformed, or mentally grossly retarded, not be painlessly "eutanised"?
Why this displaced, anti Nature pity?
Why this unnecessary burden?
 
Euthanasia has been practised in every Civilisation.
The Etruscans, Greeks, Romans, Chinese... you name it.
In certain specific cases, yes, it is the only correct approach.
 
Imperium
1105
Report to moderator   Logged
Boycott The Times and The Sunday Times.
Do not post there, do not buy a copy of either, do not advertise.
Hurt Them in the only way they understand.

BOYCOTT THE TIMES
 Imperium 1107

ricsi
Moderator
Loyal Member
Senior Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 998


« Reply #5 on: June 02, 2011, 03:35:36 PM »

Drop in U.S. birth rate is the biggest in 30 years

                Tags: The maternity business has experienced a recession, too, it appears. Births fell 4% from 2007 to 2009, the biggest drop for any two-year period since the mid-1970s, according to federal government data released Thursday.
        Webmaster's Commentary:
                                       Historically, birth rates tend to increase during times of social stress, as the instinct to perpetuate the species kicks into overdrive and resources to sublimate the sex drive into other hobbies are unavailable.  So why the dramatic drop?
 Here are two possible clues!
Children of the Corn

  This "sterilizing" corn was developed more than ten years ago!
   Scientists have created the ultimate GM crop: contraceptive corn. Waiving fields of maize may one day save the world from overpopulation. The pregnancy prevention plants are the handiwork of the San Diego biotechnology company Epicyte, where researchers have discovered a rare class of human antibodies that attack sperm.
 

So, we take this development of GM corn designed to prevent pregnancy, couple it with a rigidly enforced policy in the United States that GM foods are not labeled as such, and then look at the sudden drop on birth rate....
Need I say more?
The record is filled with instances where natural varieties of plants have been contaminated with pollen from GM plants. The "Roundup-Ready" gene has broken into the wild leading to the spontaneous emergence of weeds immune to Glyphosate weed killers. Farmers convinced to buy GM seeds and use Roundup weed killers are now stuck with crops that produce less food, are unable to reproduce themselves, and now have a worse weed problem than before they started. Farmers in India are committing suicide by the thousands as GM seeds purchased on credit fail to produce crops to pay back the loans.
As Fukushima has shown, man is not always in control of his dangerous technologies, and genetic engineering is the most dangerous technology yet tinkered with.
If that gene that makes the corn produce anti-sperm antibodies escapes into the wild, as the Roundup Ready gene did, then humankind's doom is sealed.
Report to moderator   Logged
The Hungarian language may be the root and mother of all languages of the ancient world
Berzsenyi Daniel,1830
IMPERIUM
Norman Lowell
Global Moderator
Senior Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 9483


« Reply #6 on: July 09, 2011, 11:56:27 PM »

People of the British Isles: The genetic landscape of Islay | A film by the Wellcome Trust
 
The genetic landscape of the Isle of Islay
 
Imagine the findings of this exercise in Wolverhampton, B'gham or London!
 
2012: Anno Zero!
 
Imperium
1107
« Last Edit: January 22, 2012, 04:04:46 PM by etoile noir » Report to moderator   Logged
Boycott The Times and The Sunday Times.
Do not post there, do not buy a copy of either, do not advertise.
Hurt Them in the only way they understand.

BOYCOTT THE TIMES
 Imperium 1107

IMPERIUM
Norman Lowell
Global Moderator
Senior Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 9483


« Reply #7 on: August 22, 2011, 11:45:56 AM »

From CREDO; A Book for the Very Few
 
Between September 1917 and January 1919 no fewer then 1,726,966 men were subjected to intelligence tests by the US army. The report subsequently issued on the results of these tests was edited by Lt. Col. R. M. Yerkes.

It showed a substantial Europid superiority over Negrids. In spite of the large regional variations in the results, it emerged clearly that the worst White regional results, (in the South), were superior to the best obtained by Negrids, (in the North).

Admittedly, one element of the army tests, the so-called Alpha tests for literates, was not entirely culture free. However, the Beta test for illiterates, much more culture free, displayed an even greater white superiority over the blacks! This fact utterly validates the overall conclusions of this massive survey.

In 1966 Prof. Audrey M Shuey published a new and greatly enlarged edition of her book, ?The Testing of Negro Intelligence?. It is a monumental work. In it she analysis the various groups making up American society; young children, school children, high-school and college students, the armed forces in both World Wars, veterans and adult civilians as well as gifted and retarded persons, delinquents and criminals. In each of these categories she compared Negroes with Europids. The results showed a consistent White superiority.

Of particular interest are her comparative studies of over 50,000 Negro schoolchildren and a large number of white pupils. These studies showed a mean Negro IQ of 84 compared with 100 for whites. The Negro overlap, i. e. the percentage of Negrid children overlapping the average score of the Europids was not more than 11%. The last figure, to which I shall return later, is highly significant.

That same year came the publication of the Coleman report. This gave the results of a huge investigation into the mental ability of American schoolchildren, carried out by the US. Dept. of Health, Education and Welfare. The tests were of five kinds and were administrated to schoolchildren in five grades, in eight regions of the country.

In all the tests, in each of the five school grades, in all eight regions, average Europid results were consistently superior to Negrid ones.
This report also tested Indianid and Mongolid schoolchildren. Both these groups do not have English as their mother tongue and can hence be fairly said to be disadvantaged, at least in some of the tests. In spite of this, both groups scored higher results than the Negrid. In the case of the Mongoloids, results approached those of whites and indeed, in some cases, actually surpassed them. This is not consistent with the thesis that IQ tests are culturally biased.

Still, some liberals maintain that the very fact of being black in North American society, is in itself a cultural handicap of such magnitude that it dwarfs the language aspect.

That this is not so is proved by the results of the investigations carried out by the American psychologist G. O. Ferguson in 1914. He analysed the scores obtained in IQ tests by Negroes of various grades of hybridity with whites and then, compared them with those of Europids.

The results show that the greater the proportion of white ancestry, the higher the Negro scores. Thus quadroons scored more than mulattos, who in turn showed themselves superior to Negroes with three and four black grandparents. Yet all the tested individuals where considered ? and considered themselves - to be ?Negroes?. They therefore all share the ?handicap of being black?. Obviously there is more to the matter than cultural handicaps.

Dr. F. C. McGurk has made a special study of what he calls ?the cultural hypothesis?. He analysed no fewer then 80 separate studies of Negrid/Europid differences in intelligence. He proved that notwithstanding the great improvement in the culture environment and social status of American Negroes since the First World War, their ?overlap? with whites has remained more or less constant. Again it is clear that it is not cultural, but genetic factors that are at work.

And recently, Dr. Levin who got his Ph. D. from Columbia University in philosophy, stepped into the cauldron of the race polemic by writing three erudite articles for academic journals. He contends that the cause of Negro lower intelligence is genetic, and that no amount of ?extra help? to such people can alter their predicament. He goes further, stating that most crimes in America are committed by such people due to such a reason.

The fact that Dr. Levin is Jewish did not save him from the wrath of the international-manipulators. He has been snubbed by other teachers, rebuked by the faculty senate and even though a tenured professor and supposedly cannot be fired, he has been barred from teaching for a semester without pay.

City College president Dr. Bernard Harleston, another Jew bluntly said, ?There is no place here at City College for such views. I have appointed a new panel to investigate his conduct and determine the limits of academic freedom. ?So much for free speech in America, the land of the free.
 
--------------------
 
So, the genetic factor is irrefutable - yet the Rodents continue to attack it.
For it is in their Rodent interest to promote the Equality LIE -
And the Rodents are the Masters of the Lie - as Schopenhauer defined them.
 
2012: Anno Zero!
 
Imperium
1108
« Last Edit: June 25, 2012, 08:55:48 AM by IMPERIUM » Report to moderator   Logged
Boycott The Times and The Sunday Times.
Do not post there, do not buy a copy of either, do not advertise.
Hurt Them in the only way they understand.

BOYCOTT THE TIMES
 Imperium 1107

Claude
Member
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 204


« Reply #8 on: August 22, 2011, 10:21:20 PM »

Quote from: etoile noir
Intelligence is in the genes, researchers report
A genome-wide association  study looked at 3,500 people and found that intelligence is largely  inherited, scientists reported Tuesday.                                                 (Los Angeles Times)
                                                                                                                                                           
                                   

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21826061
"Genome-wide association studies establish that human intelligence is highly heritable and polygenic."

 
^
This is the pubmed (US National Library of Medicine         National Institutes of Health) entry of the Dreary study that the article was about.
Report to moderator   Logged
IMPERIUM
Norman Lowell
Global Moderator
Senior Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 9483


« Reply #9 on: April 10, 2012, 05:49:28 PM »

http://youtu.be/ryBLR7ttzrQ
 
and
 
http://youtu.be/YtQyMGzVIyg
 
 
George Bernard Shaw: A Fabian and a Socialist (just like our Dom).
An ardent proponent of Eugenics - the upbreeding of the Race.
Socialist Sweden sterlized 13,000 misfits (bungled & botched) in 1929-31.
 
And even Salvador Allende, the darling of the Left, proposed eugenics and sterilisation.
What strange bedfellows we have!
Well you see, this is it - to be beyond the dichotomy of the Left and the Right.
 
http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/0,1518,356461,00.html
&
http://books.google.com.mt/books?id=NuUxkMC1ePYC&pg=PA126&lpg=PA126&dq=allende+eugenics&source=bl&ots=t5_rMCOwVv&sig=UnX_ogfXwrEWCNK_IDPb_RkT97E&hl=en#v=onepage&q=allende%20eugenics&f=false
(read page 126),

 
2012: Anno Zero!
Imperium
201204
« Last Edit: April 10, 2012, 07:40:41 PM by IMPERIUM » Report to moderator   Logged
Boycott The Times and The Sunday Times.
Do not post there, do not buy a copy of either, do not advertise.
Hurt Them in the only way they understand.

BOYCOTT THE TIMES
 Imperium 1107

Pages: [1] 2 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
 

A Global Voice

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 24, 2014, 06:38:40 PM

Login with username, password and session length

SMF 2.0.4 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
TinyPortal © 2005-2012

VivaMalta - The Free Speech Forum, Articles on Eugenics - Theme by Mustang Forums